Rubrics

Rubrics for participants



Rubric for Workshop
 * Multimedia Project : Common Core ||
 * || Rubric Made Using: ||  ||
 * RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org ) || ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Teacher Name: Ms. Turner ||  ||   ||   ||
 * Teacher's Name: ||  ||   ||
 * CATEGORY || 5 || 3 || 1 || 0 ||
 * Presentation || Presentation of content has visuals that establish the purpose of the lesson, Collaborated with group using Wiki's || Presentation of content had some visuals that establish most of the purpose of the lesson, Collaborated most of the time with the group using Wiki's || Presentation of content rarely had visuals that establish most of the purpose of the lesson, rarely collaborated with the group using Wiki's || Presentation of content did not have any visuals that establish the purpose of the lesson, Did not collaborate with the group using Wiki's. ||
 * Attractiveness || Makes excellent use of texts and graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation. || Makes good use of texts and graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation. || Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. || Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentaion content. ||
 * Requirements || All requirements are met and exceeded. Used technology during presentation || All requirements are met. Used technology during most of the presentation. || One requirement was not completely met. Rarely used technology for the presentation. || More than one requirement was not completely met. Did not use any technology during presentation. ||
 * Content || Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. || Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. || Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. || Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. ||
 * Date Created: Nov 09, 2013 03:55 pm (CST) ||  ||   ||   ||
 * Presentation || Presentation of content has visuals that establish the purpose of the lesson, Collaborated with group using Wiki's || Presentation of content had some visuals that establish most of the purpose of the lesson, Collaborated most of the time with the group using Wiki's || Presentation of content rarely had visuals that establish most of the purpose of the lesson, rarely collaborated with the group using Wiki's || Presentation of content did not have any visuals that establish the purpose of the lesson, Did not collaborate with the group using Wiki's. ||
 * Attractiveness || Makes excellent use of texts and graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation. || Makes good use of texts and graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation. || Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. || Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentaion content. ||
 * Requirements || All requirements are met and exceeded. Used technology during presentation || All requirements are met. Used technology during most of the presentation. || One requirement was not completely met. Rarely used technology for the presentation. || More than one requirement was not completely met. Did not use any technology during presentation. ||
 * Content || Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. || Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. || Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. || Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. ||
 * Date Created: Nov 09, 2013 03:55 pm (CST) ||  ||   ||   ||
 * Date Created: Nov 09, 2013 03:55 pm (CST) ||  ||   ||   ||

|| Rubric Made Using: ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org ) ||  ||   ||   ||
 * [[file:Workshop Rubric.xlsx]] ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Multimedia Project : Workshop ||
 * Teacher Name: Turner ||  ||   ||   ||
 * Student Name: ________________________________________ ||  ||
 * CATEGORY || 4 || 3 || 2 || 1 ||
 * Organization || Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. || Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. || Content is logically organized for the most part. || There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. ||
 * Originality || Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive. || Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. || Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking. || Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit. ||
 * Sources || Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format. || Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format. || Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format. || Very little or no source information was collected. ||
 * Attractiveness || Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation. || Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation. || Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. || Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentaion content. ||
 * Rough Draft || Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and extensively edits based on peer feedback. || Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and peer makes edits. || Provides feedback and/or edits for peer, but own rough draft was not ready for editing. || Rough draft not ready for editing and did not participate in reviewing draft of peer. ||
 * Presentation || Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. || Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time. || Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time. || Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost. ||
 * Date Created: November 10, 2013 ||  ||   ||   ||
 * Organization || Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. || Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. || Content is logically organized for the most part. || There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. ||
 * Originality || Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive. || Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. || Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking. || Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit. ||
 * Sources || Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format. || Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format. || Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format. || Very little or no source information was collected. ||
 * Attractiveness || Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation. || Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation. || Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. || Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentaion content. ||
 * Rough Draft || Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and extensively edits based on peer feedback. || Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and peer makes edits. || Provides feedback and/or edits for peer, but own rough draft was not ready for editing. || Rough draft not ready for editing and did not participate in reviewing draft of peer. ||
 * Presentation || Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. || Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time. || Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time. || Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost. ||
 * Date Created: November 10, 2013 ||  ||   ||   ||
 * Date Created: November 10, 2013 ||  ||   ||   ||